2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
Under pressure to prevent needless injury
29 Jan 2015
I am - at heart - a campaigner. One of the aspects of my role as vice president which I love is being loud and proud when helping APIL campaign against needless injury; it is after all one of the organisation’s core objectives.
The campaign we launched last year to highlight the issue of pressure ulcers really captured my imagination: When the cash strapped NHS is straining to cope, having to deal with a reported £2 billion funding shortfall, why does it not do all it can to prevent pressure ulcers, an ‘easy win’ which would save it millions of pounds in treatment for injuries that needn’t have occurred? In so doing, the NHS would also meet one of its core objectives – to improve the lives of its patients - as opposed to making them more ill in hospital than they were when they arrived.
When we rolled out the campaign some people couldn’t seem to get their heads around why the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers was campaigning to prevent injury: Surely (they said) our members benefit when people are injured, and we can successfully sue for damages on their behalf? What cynics some people can be! The press often likes to depict us either chasing ambulances for people injured outside hospital, or as bloodless vampires preying on those who are injured inside it. The truth is that actually we are decent human beings who do not wish to benefit from others’ misery but do want to fight their corner where we are needed, and right the wrongs done to them.
For those who do not know, pressure ulcers (also known perhaps more commonly as bed sores or pressure sores) develop when pressure is applied for long periods to an area of the skin. This in turn disrupts the blood supply and the skin breaks down, forming an ulcer. They are often seen in people with mobility problems, people who can’t move for long periods and are confined to a chair or a bed. The elderly are particularly prone because their skin becomes more fragile with age. If pressure ulcers are not treated appropriately and early enough they can deteriorate quickly to the point where muscle or even bone is exposed. They are – as one can imagine – very, very painful, and if left to fester, they can become incurable.
What we know from NHS England’s own figures is that the cost to the NHS of treating serious pressure ulcers could be as much as £186 million every year. But perhaps a more alarming statistic is that 95 per cent of pressure ulcers are completely preventable. So for our national health service to cause them, in turn causing increased pain to their patients, and an increased drain on NHS resources, is surely a national disgrace.
There is, however, a lot of good practice out there. APIL’s campaign draws inspiration from the excellent work of NHS Midlands & East and its determination to “stop the pressure”: Championing simple, old fashioned nursing techniques, it has devised a package of measures identifying firstly where the high risk areas on a given patient are (often their bony extremities), emphasising the importance of skin inspection, encouraging movement, identifying moisture and incontinence issues as risk factors, and ensuring good nutritional intake and hydration. Where followed, these initiatives have led to a 50% reduction in the prevalence of pressure ulcers, and they have recently been rolled out to all NHS Trusts in England. APIL argues for a wider take-up – nationwide, and in care homes across Britain.
We also call for mandatory training on the relevant NICE guidelines – prevention is the key here, and this depends on those caring for patients and residents knowing how to risk assess a patient, how to spot the early signs and treat them there and then. Tissue viability nurses are specialists in this field and should be on hand to advise and treat wounds that don’t heal as expected, or where a patient has complex needs.
Where a patient or care home resident has developed a pressure sore, or is at particular risk of doing so, one person on the care team should be given overall responsibility to ensure that appropriate advice is sought and treatment is given and that if a treatment plan is in place it is adhered to, with ultimate responsibility resting with this named person.
Further, there should also be a uniform system across the board to record the incidents of pressure ulcers, their stages, how they are treated and the outcomes. The Care Quality Commission should carry out spot-check inspections to ensure that proper data is being collected and there is no false or misleading reporting. This is particularly important because APIL has discovered a ‘postcode lottery’ when it comes to the standards in hospitals across the land, and even sometimes between hospitals in the same district. Patients and their loved ones need information they can rely on about how seriously a hospital – or a Trust – take the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers, to enable them to take a view.
The soothsayer Richard Susskind, speaking at a lecture last year, addressed the hall on what he felt consumers wanted from the law. He said that people don’t want an ambulance at the bottom of the cliff; they want a fence at the top. He is right. I would prefer to live in a world where no one was needlessly injured, even if I had to retrain as a tax lawyer. This is why campaigning to prevent needless injury is perhaps APIL’s most important objective and one behind which we all can rally.
Asbestos in Schools - the time for action is now!
14 Jan 2015
As a personal
injury lawyer, my role is normally to try and help people piece back together
their lives after suffering serious injury. Campaigning on the issue of
asbestos in schools, though, gives me a rare
opportunity to change the future.
More than 75 per
cent of Britain’s state schools contain asbestos and indeed in Wales the
percentage is higher at approximately 85 per cent. In other words the vast
majority of the population of the UK may have encountered asbestos whilst at
I first became
aware of the issue when I was instructed on behalf of a school cleaner who had
been diagnosed with the asbestos-related cancer, mesothelioma. Unsurprisingly
she was unable to recall any exposure to asbestos. It did not occur to her that
she might have been exposed to asbestos as a child at school or later when
working at a number of schools.
Not long afterwards
I had the privilege of hearing Michael Lees MBE speak. Michael, who lost his
wife Gina, a schoolteacher aged only 51, to mesothelioma, has been a tireless
campaigner on asbestos in schools and his sheer bloody minded persistence has
been an inspiration to many including myself.
I quickly realised
that whilst in England, the Department for Education was taking some note, in Wales
where health and education are both devolved to Welsh government, no-one
appeared to be taking responsibility for the problem. This led to the founding
of the Right to Know Asbestos in Schools campaign. I have since become part of
the UK Asbestos in Schools Group and attend the Joint Union Asbestos Committee
as an observer.
So why is this
important? We are seeing an increasing number of teachers, a profession not
normally associated with exposure to asbestos, dying from mesothelioma. This
has risen from three teachers per year dying in 1980 to 22 by 2012. Official
statistics only record deaths aged up to 75. Former teachers aged over 75 have
also died from mesothelioma. Since 1980 more than 291 teachers have died.
There are also
deaths from mesothelioma amongst teaching assistants and school secretaries. It
is known that school cleaners, caretakers and cooks are also dying but the
occupational statistics are generic and do not identify those who worked in
This is just the tip of the iceberg, however, because
for every teacher there are 20-30 children, and they are more vulnerable. We
are now seeing people dying from mesothelioma as a result of childhood
In June 2013 the
Committee on Carcinogenicity reported to the Department for Education that
children were more vulnerable than adults to asbestos exposure.
and world renowned epidemiologist Professor Julian Peto has estimated that
between 200-300 people will die each year because of their exposure to asbestos at school in the 1960s and 1970s.
If people were
dying in such numbers because of accidents on the roads or at work then there
would be an outcry. However because of the nature of mesothelioma, and the fact
that it takes decades for the disease to become symptomatic, exposure to
asbestos in our schools is not getting the attention it deserves.
As our school
buildings age, it is becoming harder to manage the asbestos in our schools. The
excellent report of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Occupational Health
“Asbestos in Schools The need for action” contains the following
- “The Government should set a programme for the phased removal of
asbestos from all schools, with priority being given to those schools
where the asbestos is considered to be most dangerous or damaged.
- Standards in asbestos training should be set and the training should
be mandatory and properly funded.
- A trial should take place to perfect a system of widespread air sampling
- A policy of openness should be adopted. Parents, teachers and
support staff should be annually updated on the presence of asbestos in
their schools and the measures that are being taken to manage it.
- Pro-active inspections to determine the standards of asbestos management
should be reinstated, with a view to reducing future costs.
- Data should be collected centrally on the extent, type and condition
of asbestos in schools and this becomes an integral part of the data
collection of the condition of the nation’s schools.”
A real issue is
that we do not know the measure of the problem that faces us, as we do not
truly know the extent of the asbestos in our schools. Governments need to
collate the data so that the action to be taken can be properly assessed.
To quote from
Professor Peto’s evidence to the Education Select Committee in March 2013
"All that matters is whether or not kids are
breathing in asbestos and, until you find that out, everything else is hot
We cannot afford further inaction!
Should the hairdressing industry be regulated?
08 Jan 2015
Since I qualified in 2007 I have had an interest in claims arising out of beauty treatments, most notably hairdressing. I have seen first- hand the devastating effects of negligent hairdressing treatments, ranging from chemical burns to the scalp and face to loss of hair through misuse of products. The hairdressing industry is currently unregulated – a very worrying thought when you consider the chemicals used by hairdressers who potentially could be untrained and unqualified.
In the past APIL has called for regulation of the industry, as has the Hairdressing Council which was established through the 1964 Hairdressers Regulation Act with the intention of giving status to hairdressers and therefore assurance to consumers. Registration with the Council remains voluntary because the Act was never fully enforced.
The Hairdressing Council estimates that only around 10 per cent of hairdressers have registered. As the industry is unregulated, and no qualifications are needed to practice as a hairdresser, there may be many that are holding themselves out as hairdressers without having any qualifications. These would not be eligible to register with the Hairdressing Council. The Hairdressing Council does have the power to deal with complaints against hairdressers who are registered, which offers a little more assurance to those consumers who find their local state registered hairdresser online- but is this really enough?
There have been attempts to introduce a Bill in the UK to seek regulation and this culminated in the Hairdressers Registration (Amendment) Bill being introduced into the House of Commons as a private members’ bill. This was, however, defeated in a vote by 67 to 63 in November 2011. The purpose of the Bill was to promote better regulation of the hairdressing industry to include a code of conduct and compulsory public liability insurance. The Bill was introduced by David Morris MP who, following defeat, said: “It is very unusual for a Ten Minute Rule Bill to go to division. The House of Commons was clearly divided. I hope that now I have drawn attention to the regulation of the hairdressing industry this important issue will continue to be debated."
The matter has not since been debated in the House until this week, when Welsh MP Nia Griffith’s call in an adjournment debate for a compulsory state register was rejected by the UK Government. Ministers said a register would cost the industry £75m.
However, in November 2013 the matter was debated in the Senedd in Wales. It was noted during the debate that the Welsh Government’s powers in the area are limited and that Vince Cable had been written to by Eluned Parrott AM to press the case and to ask him to look again at the regulation of the industry. which is estimated to be worth between £5 to £6.5 billion a year to the UK economy to be lost.
The Hairdressing Council continues its campaign and held a reception at the Senedd in February 2014 to continue to raise the awareness. I would urge you all, lawyers and consumers alike, as well as professional stylists, to give their support to the Council in lobbying the UK Government to introduce regulation in the area and limit the traumatic injuries suffered by consumers.